Since I wrote this, it seems there is a renewed interest for those old cheap cameras, and the prices have a bad tendancy to go crazy. I since connverted most of them for Infra-Red photography.
back in 2019:
Take the little Panasonic FZ100 bridge camera that was sold for $500 in 2010. Now it's cheaper than a Nikon EN-EL4a battery...It is a so called super-zoom camera, featuring an almost wide-angle 24x zoom lens (equivalent to 25-600mm F\/2.8-5.2 in 35mm), 14 megapixel and 5fps continuous shooting at full image resolution with AF tracking and a buffer of 11 photos. There is a small articulated lcd screen, a terrible electronic viewfinder, the optics are just ok and the flash is basically useless, but it has PASM modes and can record RAW. 
The FZ100 was infamous for its alleged noise at base ISO, even for a small 1\2.3" sensor.  
So what? Its imperfections make it interesting.  Like the 5MP compact Olympus X500 aka c470Z that had absolutely nothing special, or the 7MP Fuji Z10fd, Many Samsung digicams, or the Pentax X90, yet another generic super zoom compact bridge. 
All crappy cameras with almost absolutely nothing worth it, that you can get for 10 bucks or less at a thrift store. 
All producing the same dull noisy soft overprocessed jpegs.
Still, that makes them interesting from a creative point of vue. At the time, they sucked. Period. barely good enough for vacation shots.
Frame before you shoot: that is basically all you can do with these cameras. Then, just let the imperfections of the  overprocessed photos trigger your inspiration: emphasize them, or do all you can to turn them into something good. It's interesting in that you will learn a lot about your post processing software(s). 
Just unleash your creativity. Are the jpegs too saturated? try to unsaturate, or add saturation. It's too soft? let topaz plugins invent the missing details. Too noisy? just add even more noise: or use extreme denoising. And all the options in between.
Obviously, even when they were sold brand new, these cameras weren't good at casual photography. Shoot something different. Experiment with new subjects, go full abstract.
I'm not talking here of turning a crappy photo into a great photo: no post processing can do that. It's all about turning a pixel mess into art. The lomo of digital somehow.
shooting an outdated camera is actually quite fun, and turning the photos into something special is even more fun.

You may also like

Birding with a cheap Sigma 135-400?
When it comes to birding, the common advice is to get a camera with low noise, fast AF, fast burst, big buffer and some long lens, preferably a super fast telephoto. It is indeed good advice, but you'll have to pay thousands of dollars to buy that gear, even on the used market. What if you want to shoot birds on a super tight budget? You'll still need some camera and lens. Maybe consider buying some older inexpensive gear?
Fun with the DXO ONE in 2023
In 2015, Dxo decided to sell a tiny camera that connected to the iPhone. They used the 1inch 20MP sensor from the Sony RX100 m3 that I really love a lot, 32mm equivalent lens that is pretty bright: F/1.8 and shoots RAW.
Olympus OM-D E-M5
August 2018 I bought that little camera for $150. Definitely a bargain considering it was sold boxed, in a not too bad condition, with less than 6.000 clicks, and included two batteries and charger, a 12-50mm F/3.5-6.3 zoom lens, a 45mm F/1.8 prime lens, the tiny Olympus flash, a couple filters (ND1000 and CPL) and a (slow) 64GB SD card that I just trew away and replaced with a Sandisk Extreme Pro.
Nikon N50 / F50 shooting Kodak UltraMax 400
I didn't shoot film for years. Didn't really plan to. Not that I don't like it, because I love film, but I just didn't have an opportunity to do so. When I saw that Nikon F50 with a 35-80 for 20 bucks, I just bought it. Ordered a new battery on amazon and a couple rolls of Kodak Ultramax 400
Shooting the Sony Alpha 77 mk II in 2022
I wrote about the A77. But what about the noticeably more expensive used A77m2? You’ll have to pay $600 to $800 to buy a used one in good condition. Is it worth it? The A77m2 came a few years after the A77. in my opinion, the improvements are mostly marketing stunts. Despite a lot more AF sensors, a so-called new AF system, better video and a bigger buffer, I keep thinking the A77m2 used isn’t a very good deal.
Sony alpha A200: a Nikon D80 with IBIS
After Sony bought the Minolta photography department, they released the A100 in mid 2006, the A700 in mid 2007, and the A200/A300/A350 in early 2008. Two years after the Nikon D80, we find the same SONY ICX493AQA CCD sensor (wich is basically a slower ICX483AQA that was in the Nikon D200 released 3 years earlier) in what is basically a Minolta body with Sony branding imitating a Nikon D80..
Sigma 500mm F/7.2 AF APO
How good can be a Sigma 500mm F/7.2 AF lens from 1990? Simple answer: definitely worth 89 bucks BUT there are lots of BUT...
Shooting the Sony A77 in 2022
If you have some A-mount lenses and want an APSC DSLR that can take them natively, you don’t have many options. Especially if you can’t / don’t want to spend a lot of money.
Tokina 12-24 DX adapted on Micro 4/3
Some sample photos taken with the Tokina SD ATX pro 12-24 F/4 IF DX ASP Nikon F-Mount on the Olympus EM1.
Shooting the Olympus OM-D E-M1 in 2023, 2024 and later.
One month ago, I was fed up with travelling with camera gear. Air travel became a miserable experience: arguing with check-in people, Unpack all that expensive shit at security, having gear damaged in the plane when frantic fellow passengers trow their hard cases in the overhead bins. I want to travel light: then a classified caught my eye: EM1, grip, charger, 2 batteries and 45-150 for 300.
Back to Top