Since I wrote this, it seems there is a renewed interest for those old cheap cameras, and the prices have a bad tendancy to go crazy. I since connverted most of them for Infra-Red photography.
back in 2019:
Take the little Panasonic FZ100 bridge camera that was sold for $500 in 2010. Now it's cheaper than a Nikon EN-EL4a battery...It is a so called super-zoom camera, featuring an almost wide-angle 24x zoom lens (equivalent to 25-600mm F\/2.8-5.2 in 35mm), 14 megapixel and 5fps continuous shooting at full image resolution with AF tracking and a buffer of 11 photos. There is a small articulated lcd screen, a terrible electronic viewfinder, the optics are just ok and the flash is basically useless, but it has PASM modes and can record RAW. 
The FZ100 was infamous for its alleged noise at base ISO, even for a small 1\2.3" sensor.  
So what? Its imperfections make it interesting.  Like the 5MP compact Olympus X500 aka c470Z that had absolutely nothing special, or the 7MP Fuji Z10fd, Many Samsung digicams, or the Pentax X90, yet another generic super zoom compact bridge. 
All crappy cameras with almost absolutely nothing worth it, that you can get for 10 bucks or less at a thrift store. 
All producing the same dull noisy soft overprocessed jpegs.
Still, that makes them interesting from a creative point of vue. At the time, they sucked. Period. barely good enough for vacation shots.
Frame before you shoot: that is basically all you can do with these cameras. Then, just let the imperfections of the  overprocessed photos trigger your inspiration: emphasize them, or do all you can to turn them into something good. It's interesting in that you will learn a lot about your post processing software(s). 
Just unleash your creativity. Are the jpegs too saturated? try to unsaturate, or add saturation. It's too soft? let topaz plugins invent the missing details. Too noisy? just add even more noise: or use extreme denoising. And all the options in between.
Obviously, even when they were sold brand new, these cameras weren't good at casual photography. Shoot something different. Experiment with new subjects, go full abstract.
I'm not talking here of turning a crappy photo into a great photo: no post processing can do that. It's all about turning a pixel mess into art. The lomo of digital somehow.
shooting an outdated camera is actually quite fun, and turning the photos into something special is even more fun.

You may also like

Olympus OM-D E-M5
2018
August 2018 I bought that little camera for $150. Definitely a bargain considering it was sold boxed, in a not too bad condition, with less than 6.000 clicks, and included two batteries and charger, a 12-50mm F/3.5-6.3 zoom lens, a 45mm F/1.8 prime lens, the tiny Olympus flash, a couple filters (ND1000 and CPL) and a (slow) 64GB SD card that I just trew away and replaced with a Sandisk Extreme Pro.
Tokina 12-24 DX adapted on Micro 4/3
2023
Some sample photos taken with the Tokina SD ATX pro 12-24 F/4 IF DX ASP Nikon F-Mount on the Olympus EM1.
Shooting the Nikon D70 in 2022
2019
2004... Jesus, time passes quite fast. I won't review that Nikon D70, the specs sheets and reviews are everywhere on the internet. Only 3 figures are significant anyway: 6.1 megapixel CCD sensor, 1\/8000th second max shutter speed and 1\/500th second x-sync. I decided to buy and shoot this camera again with the Nikkor 18-135. For 20 bucks, what could go wrong?
Shooting the Sony A77 in 2022
2021
If you have some A-mount lenses and want an APSC DSLR that can take them natively, you don’t have many options. Especially if you can’t / don’t want to spend a lot of money.
Fun with the DXO ONE in 2023
2023
In 2015, Dxo decided to sell a tiny camera that connected to the iPhone. They used the 1inch 20MP sensor from the Sony RX100 m3 that I really love a lot, 32mm equivalent lens that is pretty bright: F/1.8 and shoots RAW.
Shooting the Nikon D200 in 2022
2019
The D200 is a camera I always loved. At the time it came out, it was a hell of a camera for the price Nikon asked. Shooting it in 2019 is still a pleasant experience. 2005 specs? that's outdated, nobody wants that. Photos taken with that camera will be ugly, especially compared to the Sony A9 ($4500), the Nikon D850 ($3000) or the Canon 5D mark whatever ($2700). Or will it not?
Shooting the Sony Alpha 700 in 2022
2021
I really never was really interested in Sony after they bought Minolta and started their "own" line of DSLRs. 15 years later, I buy a pristine Alpha A700 for peanuts and I quite like the Minolta DNA.
Sigma 500mm F/7.2 AF APO
2022
How good can be a Sigma 500mm F/7.2 AF lens from 1990? Simple answer: definitely worth 89 bucks BUT there are lots of BUT...
Sony alpha A200: a Nikon D80 with IBIS
2019
After Sony bought the Minolta photography department, they released the A100 in mid 2006, the A700 in mid 2007, and the A200/A300/A350 in early 2008. Two years after the Nikon D80, we find the same SONY ICX493AQA CCD sensor (wich is basically a slower ICX483AQA that was in the Nikon D200 released 3 years earlier) in what is basically a Minolta body with Sony branding imitating a Nikon D80..
Nikkor Plastic 70-300 F/4-5.6 AF-D ED
2023
This Nikkor 70-300 has been one of the most poorly reviewed Nikkor lens ever.
Back to Top