I can put this lens on my beloved Minolta 7D, or any Sony A-mount camera, and it can be adapted too. The resulting images are just great.
In summary, if it wasn't for its mechanical AF coupling that is a bit slow side of things, this lens would be almost perfect, especially considering its price.
It is a lens from 2008, at the time part of Tamron's top line lenses. Forget about macro tough: the reproduction ratio is only ⅓. Still, its close focusing abilities are better than the other equivalent lenses made at the time: a little less than 3 ft.
It’s very well built, but definitely not environmentally sealed. As I just said, (on Sony and Pentax) the AF coupling is mechanical: meaning it’s using the little motor in the camera instead of a fancy fast integrated motor and therefore it can be a bit slow and noisy. Also, there is no direct override of the AF ring: you have to pull it to go into manual mode. Not super user friendly.
Anyway, that is all for what is not super great with this 70-200mm.
I’m shooting it on APSC cameras, but the following should also apply to full frame cameras. Maybe just barely a bit <strike>worse<\/strike> less good.
Resolution is impressive despite the expected slight softness / lack of micro contrast at F/2.8 which definitely is not an issue at all. If you don’t want to “fix it in post”, F\/3.5 is the way to go.
Distortion, chromatic aberration and vignetting are almost non-existent at any aperture. Even in the so-called macro mode. There is absolutely nothing to say about color rendition: it’s neutral. I didn’t have (yet?) any bad flare issue. The ugly huge lens hood must be quite efficient in that aspect. 
Bokeh is OK, not the best, not the worst, but above average anyways. Again, nothing special here.
AF on the Minolta 7D is fast (for this camera) and I didn’t experience a lot of hunting even in super low light. Accuracy on the Minolta is perfect. On the Sony cameras, Af is faster than the 7D, but compared to other A mount lenses, especially the ones with supersonic motor, it definitely isn’t fast. In good light, with motor speed set to high, it is perfectly usable, but I tend to blame the body for some variance in accuracy in any AF mode other than single AF, especially with the A77ii. If light is less than great, I definitely need to set the motor speed to slow, but there is still some hunting, and again, accuracy can be inconsistent. I’m pretty sure it’s NOT the lens fault since this is happening with any lens on my Sony cameras.
Overall, it’s a good neutral lens that you forget once it is mounted on the camera. The optics are great and neutral, the AF a bit slow, and that’s it. Seriously, if you can get one for cheap on the used market, it is really a great option.

You may also like

Birding with a cheap Sigma 135-400?
2021
When it comes to birding, the common advice is to get a camera with low noise, fast AF, fast burst, big buffer and some long lens, preferably a super fast telephoto. It is indeed good advice, but you'll have to pay thousands of dollars to buy that gear, even on the used market. What if you want to shoot birds on a super tight budget? You'll still need some camera and lens. Maybe consider buying some older inexpensive gear?
Shooting the Sony Alpha 77 mk II in 2022
2021
I wrote about the A77. But what about the noticeably more expensive used A77m2? You’ll have to pay $600 to $800 to buy a used one in good condition. Is it worth it? The A77m2 came a few years after the A77. in my opinion, the improvements are mostly marketing stunts. Despite a lot more AF sensors, a so-called new AF system, better video and a bigger buffer, I keep thinking the A77m2 used isn’t a very good deal.
Nikon N50 / F50 shooting Kodak UltraMax 400
2023
I didn't shoot film for years. Didn't really plan to. Not that I don't like it, because I love film, but I just didn't have an opportunity to do so. When I saw that Nikon F50 with a 35-80 for 20 bucks, I just bought it. Ordered a new battery on amazon and a couple rolls of Kodak Ultramax 400
Shooting the Olympus OM-D E-M1 in 2023, 2024 and later.
2023
One month ago, I was fed up with travelling with camera gear. Air travel became a miserable experience: arguing with check-in people, Unpack all that expensive shit at security, having gear damaged in the plane when frantic fellow passengers trow their hard cases in the overhead bins. I want to travel light: then a classified caught my eye: EM1, grip, charger, 2 batteries and 45-150 for 300.
Can you take any photo with an outdated crappy camera?
2019
A short essay I wrote back in 2019.
Sony RX100 m3: all you need from 24 to 70mm
2022
I got this little camera for $200 a couple years ago and didn't write about it yet.
Shooting the Sony A77 in 2022
2021
If you have some A-mount lenses and want an APSC DSLR that can take them natively, you don’t have many options. Especially if you can’t / don’t want to spend a lot of money.
Shooting the Minolta Maxxum / Dynax 7D in 2022
2019
The short lived most advanced Minolta DSLR was released in late 2004. It became later the foundation for Sony's A-mount cameras. It featured the first in body stabilization in a DSLR, a 6MP CCD sensor and loads of controls. This camera is a photographer's delight. The body feels right, the controls are great and natural: coming from a film SLR, you just feel at home with the Minolta 7D. And You can use all the now often cheap quality Minolta lenses, as well as the more expensive Sony A-Mount lenses.
Shooting the Nikon D70 in 2022
2019
2004... Jesus, time passes quite fast. I won't review that Nikon D70, the specs sheets and reviews are everywhere on the internet. Only 3 figures are significant anyway: 6.1 megapixel CCD sensor, 1\/8000th second max shutter speed and 1\/500th second x-sync. I decided to buy and shoot this camera again with the Nikkor 18-135. For 20 bucks, what could go wrong?
Shooting the Sony Alpha 700 in 2022
2021
I really never was really interested in Sony after they bought Minolta and started their "own" line of DSLRs. 15 years later, I buy a pristine Alpha A700 for peanuts and I quite like the Minolta DNA.
Back to Top