I got this lens on Ebay for Minolta / Sony A-mount. The Sigma 500mm F/7.2 APO AF is a 35 years old AF lens. Basically, it is a 400mm f/5.6 with integrated x1.25 teleconverter. You could buy it in the 90s for 500bucks and it really didn't turn heads at the time.
Age is a disease... The stupid Sigma Zen coating was litteraly disintegrating. Had to spend 3 hours removing it, and it's not totally done yet. But it will, and this lens will look quite pretty. The glass is not too bad. There is some dust, no fungus, and likely no balsam separation or foggy element that the naked eye can see. First thing you notice is how compact this lens is. It's smaller than the 135-400 and not very heavy: 1.1kg. Feels nice to walk with a 500mm that is lite. But as we'll see later, it requires a tripod even with the body stabilization, which annihilates the weight advantage.
Anyways, after cleaning, it turned out that lens suffered some extreme  back focus. Even with AF fine tune set to -20 on the A77, there is still a little backfocus. The fact you need to shoot this lens at least at F/11 to get some sharpness helps with that problem: there is a more comfortable depth of field.
Like all Sigma lenses of that era, it suffers some weird spherical and chromatic aberration; color fringing definitely is an issue. It can be somehow mitigated in post.
AF is not bad in good light but it’s better to set the AF motor to slow. On a static contrasted subject it’s OK if you don’t shake… On a tripod (almost mandatory) it’s much better. Manual focusing is not easy: the action is super short, and since it’s old, the mechanism is basically moving freely: if you blow on the focus ring, it will move. When I disassemble it to adjust the internal focusing element to neutralize the back focus and clean the glass, i’ll try to make it more resistant.
This is not a sharp lens at base aperture, and contrast is not great either, especially micro contrast, even if you manually nail focus perfectly. F/11 is the minimum aperture to get acceptable sharpness. It also makes the spherical aberration less of an issue and contrast is greatly improved. It keeps improving until you reach the sensor diffraction limit.
Mounted on the A77 II, 0nly the center AF point is working due to it being an F/7.2 lens. Overall, I’m happy with the images I got from this very inexpensive old lens.F/11 requires a lot of light, and on a long lens you need speed to reduce hand blur. The way to go with this lens is to crank the ISO up (ISO noise isn’t really a problem anymore, blabla blabla I already said that many times). Even with the body stabilization and tripod, you need fix to freeze what you’re likely to shoot with a 500mm that behaves like a 750.
You can judge by yourself with the photos. All were imported in LR, sent to DXO Photolab for basic processing (denoise prime, fine contrast, purple fringing, cropping), sent back in LR for the final processing. A few were also processed in Topaz sharpen AI on a 50% transparent layer (the gulls I shot hand held were soft. The AF struggled). My usual workflow. Nothing fancy or special.
For 89 bucks, it’s a lens you can buy if you occasionally need 500mm and don’t want to spend big money. That is if you can find one with good glass. They aren’t super common, lots of them have fungus or fogged internal elements, and ALL of them have the stupid sticky disintegrating Sigma Zen coating.

You may also like

Olympus OM-D E-M5
2018
August 2018 I bought that little camera for $150. Definitely a bargain considering it was sold boxed, in a not too bad condition, with less than 6.000 clicks, and included two batteries and charger, a 12-50mm F/3.5-6.3 zoom lens, a 45mm F/1.8 prime lens, the tiny Olympus flash, a couple filters (ND1000 and CPL) and a (slow) 64GB SD card that I just trew away and replaced with a Sandisk Extreme Pro.
Shooting the Minolta Maxxum / Dynax 7D in 2022
2019
The short lived most advanced Minolta DSLR was released in late 2004. It became later the foundation for Sony's A-mount cameras. It featured the first in body stabilization in a DSLR, a 6MP CCD sensor and loads of controls. This camera is a photographer's delight. The body feels right, the controls are great and natural: coming from a film SLR, you just feel at home with the Minolta 7D. And You can use all the now often cheap quality Minolta lenses, as well as the more expensive Sony A-Mount lenses.
Can you take any photo with an outdated crappy camera?
2019
A short essay I wrote back in 2019.
Birding with a cheap Sigma 135-400?
2021
When it comes to birding, the common advice is to get a camera with low noise, fast AF, fast burst, big buffer and some long lens, preferably a super fast telephoto. It is indeed good advice, but you'll have to pay thousands of dollars to buy that gear, even on the used market. What if you want to shoot birds on a super tight budget? You'll still need some camera and lens. Maybe consider buying some older inexpensive gear?
Shooting the Olympus OM-D E-M1 in 2023, 2024 and later.
2023
One month ago, I was fed up with travelling with camera gear. Air travel became a miserable experience: arguing with check-in people, Unpack all that expensive shit at security, having gear damaged in the plane when frantic fellow passengers trow their hard cases in the overhead bins. I want to travel light: then a classified caught my eye: EM1, grip, charger, 2 batteries and 45-150 for 300.
Nikkor Plastic 70-300 F/4-5.6 AF-D ED
2023
This Nikkor 70-300 has been one of the most poorly reviewed Nikkor lens ever.
Shooting the Nikon D2Xs in 2022
2020
During summer 2005, after a very long wait, the Nikon D2X was released. At the time my go to camera was the Minolta 7D that replaced my Nikon film cameras for my digital needs. I also shot the Nikon D70 but I prefered the Minolta. Both cameras were quite slow, and 6MP only. I wasn't really convinced by the Nikon D1/x/h/d2h. Soon after buying the D70, the D2X was announced, making me question that early GAS compulsive buy.
Shooting the Nikon D200 in 2022
2019
The D200 is a camera I always loved. At the time it came out, it was a hell of a camera for the price Nikon asked. Shooting it in 2019 is still a pleasant experience. 2005 specs? that's outdated, nobody wants that. Photos taken with that camera will be ugly, especially compared to the Sony A9 ($4500), the Nikon D850 ($3000) or the Canon 5D mark whatever ($2700). Or will it not?
Sony RX100 m3: all you need from 24 to 70mm
2022
I got this little camera for $200 a couple years ago and didn't write about it yet.
Nikon N50 / F50 shooting Kodak UltraMax 400
2023
I didn't shoot film for years. Didn't really plan to. Not that I don't like it, because I love film, but I just didn't have an opportunity to do so. When I saw that Nikon F50 with a 35-80 for 20 bucks, I just bought it. Ordered a new battery on amazon and a couple rolls of Kodak Ultramax 400
Back to Top